ah yes you are absolutely right, i did some research on this track and what you are saying is true, my deepest apologies! i will admit defeat when fact's are given and see them for myself, in other words,good run! once again my apologies!

Ah the good old streetfire misinformation campaign...where to start. 1st) Its a 1,000 foot track, not an 1/8th (660 feet), not a 1/4 (1,320 feet) 2nd) It was a 10.43 @ 97mph in the 1000 foot with a 1.67s 60ft. I'll find the slip and scan it later if its that much of an issue. 3rd) To the guy that said the fox could catch it in a 1/4...not likely, he had a 12.x in the 1000 foot, you do the math. 4th) Did i mention this isn't a 1/4 mile track? I live in Arkansas and due to some BS law here they don't have any 1/4 mile tracks within a 3 hour drive. 5th) He did heat up his tires. That was our 2nd race, the first time he was on street tires and he got beat even worse. This race he was on drag radials and did a nice long burnout. Can you call it a ricer excuse if the people making the excuses drive domestics?

dude that was horrible! 10's? in the 1/8! man take some driving lessons if u run 10's in the 1/8 ull prob hit 16's in the 1/4 mile! sorry man but no props from me on this one

10's in the 1/8 is really slow for both cars

Lol...excuses. Would have like to see the 1/4 tho.

awd vs rwd that didnt get traction, let him heat up the tires more then race again

fox has more top end even with your turbo race him in the 1/4

its an 1/8th mile track smart guy

10.43 + 2 sec....i call bs too

its a 1000 foot track